When I first heard Zulip is taking part in Google Code-In and was asked to become a mentor, I got excited. And scared. The more time passed, the more scared I was, feeling inadequate and not experienced enough to review other people’s code.
After the first week of GCI I was terrified. It felt like the reviews were a never-ending battle between the quality and quantity (GCI students are motivated to do as many tasks as possible due to the contest rules). I’ve constantly been asked questions I didn’t know the answers to and was expected to understand features from a large chunk of the codebase - larger than I felt comfortable with.
I felt like I was only disturbing the learning process and irritating the students with my constant questions and nagging for improvements. I was learning a lot to my own benefit:
After explaining git flow many times, I finally feel confident while working in the terminal and not just pretending to be comfortable with it.
I’ve learned to rebase, amend and merge other’s work into the codebase.
I’ve created a group of tasks on interactive bots and learned more from students asking questions about them than from creating my own bot.
I’ve had a comprehensible conversation in German with one of the students, which is a big deal for me since I haven’t used the language in years.
Gradually, I became more and more confident with code reviews and helping out on chat. I’ve read a bunch of articles on multiple topics concerning Python, APIs, webhooks, frontend testing and typing. I’ve learned a ton from reading other mentors’ reviews of the contributions. I’m now able to calmly read a question and not panic when I initially don’t know the answer, even though I’m supposed to.
Being in this double role of a mentee and a mentor, I think I benefited much more from GCI than I thought possible. Also, Zulip is rapidly being improved by many motivated students - hundreds of mypy annotations were added, multiple features were fixed, many interactive bots were introduced, and a ton of user documentation was written. I did not expect for it to go this well.
Over the past few weeks I’ve also had a lot of thoughts on improving the process and communication, even going as far as to have pull request for that.
What’s important to the mentor
When asking for help or a review, give the mentor some context on the issue. They are working on multiple issues and helping many people - they might not immediately remember all the relevant facts. Show what you have already done to solve the problem.
Think about the user.
When developing a feature, think about the user perspective whenever applicable. What are the expected use cases? What would be comfortable to use, not just simple and reasonable to implement?
Respect others’ time.
Before submitting anything, make sure you took care of any sloppiness (typos, linter errors, unnecessary chunks of code). Test your feature manually. Make sure you are asking for help for something you weren’t able to solve, not something you forgot to check.
Don’t expect simple answers.
When asking questions, expect help, but be prepared to accept it in the form it’s been offered. If a mentor is pointing you to an external resource or asking you to double check your implementation, they’re doing it to help you learn.
Don’t be embarrassed.
Sometimes you might think asking a question will make you look
inadequate. Don’t let this keep you stuck. If you’ve tried and failed, there is nothing to be ashamed of.
Strive for self-guidance.
Have ownership of your work - both the solutions and the problems. Be proud of your achievements, however small. You are learning here and the best way to learn is to take responsibility.
I’m sure you can do it - so you should be too. Don’t discourage yourself and lessen your skills. You are here to learn and I’m here to help you, there is nothing wrong with making mistakes on the way. Just be sure to understand and learn from them.